Comments on: Webhooks, REST and the Open Web

By: W van Dam

W van Dam — Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:37:58 +0000

In reply to julien51. Resthook are actually exactly the same as Webhooks*. However, their docs are a good introduction on scenarios you got to keep in mind when setting up webhooks. They also got a few basic case studies on how others implemented webhooks. *) The only difference they state is that Resthooks can be subscribed to via REST as opposed to via a webform, which is a rather obvious step to take and something Jeff Lindsey already mentioned years ago.

By: Webhooks, REST and the Open Web | Entropic Syne...

Webhooks, REST and the Open Web | Entropic Syne... — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:05:24 +0000

[…] PuSH is an open protocol that treats webhooks like subscriptions. […]

By: Abhinav Saxena (@abhinav)

Abhinav Saxena (@abhinav) — Sat, 14 Sep 2013 08:29:14 +0000

Would love to get your feedback on https://github.com/abhinavs/webhooks

By: julien51

julien51 — Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:35:07 +0000

In reply to Johnny Jelinek IV. Not really. They're just a proprietary attempt to compete with an open protocol.

By: Webhooks, REST and the Open Web | nodeJS and RE...

Webhooks, REST and the Open Web | nodeJS and RE... — Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:05:38 +0000

[…] PuSH is an open protocol that treats webhooks like subscriptions. […]

By: Johnny Jelinek IV

Johnny Jelinek IV — Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:37:43 +0000

In reply to Nightwolf. REST hooks are an evolution of webhooks.

By: Nightwolf

Nightwolf — Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:53:51 +0000

Isn’t this the same as http://resthooks.org/docs/?

By: Webhooks, REST and the Open Web | Rocketboom

Webhooks, REST and the Open Web | Rocketboom — Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:58:01 +0000

[…] Webhooks, REST and the Open Web Source: /2013/09/12/webhooks/ 0 […]